Criminalistics Essay

Jennifer Humphrey Criminalistics Individual Work Week 3 1. Name two manufactured sedatives and depict the reason for which each is normally utilized. * Methadone is maybe the most popular integrated sedative. An individual that gets intermittent dosages of methadone would not get high on the off chance that he/she at that point took heroin or morphine. It’s design is to take out an addicts want for heroin, with negligible symptoms. Essentially, heroin addicts get methadone to decrease or forestall future heroin use.Some doctors additionally endorse methadone for relief from discomfort. * Oxycontin’s dynamic fixing is oxycodone, which is an engineered tranquilize firmly identified with morphine and heroin in its synthetic structure. Oxycontin is a pain relieving that has influences like those of heroin. Used to treat constant agony. 2. What is a drug? Name three ordinarily utilized stimulants. Psychedelic drugs will be drugs that can cause checked modifications in typica l points of view, observations and moods.Three regularly utilized stimulants are LSD, PCP, and Marijuana. 3. What is energizer? Name two generally utilized energizers, An energizer is a medication that is utilized to animate, or accelerate the focal sensory system. Cocaine and methamphetamines (ICE) 4. What is break and how is it created? An especially intense type of cocaine delivered by blending cocaine and preparing pop and afterward water, and afterward warmed, bringing about an answer. The material us at that point broken into little lumps that vendors soften as split rocks.Crack gives a more prominent elation. 5. What is the distinction between a screening test and an affirmation test? A screening test is a starter test used to diminish the quantity of probability personalities of an obscure substance. An affirmation test is a solitary test that explicitly recognizes a substance. References Saferstein, 2009, pages 286-287 Saferstein, 2009, pages 287-290 Saferstein, 2009, page 293-295 Saferstein, 2009, page 295 Saferstein, 2009, page 303

The Major Threats Caused By Depletion Of Resources essays

The Major Threats Caused By Depletion Of Resources articles Assets are the things that we can remove from the earth. Ventures, which separate the earths assets, incorporate mining, ranger service and oil extraction. Present-day civilisation depends on a gigantic usage of non-replaceable minerals and energizes, for example, coal, oil and normal gasses. Different materials, for example, cotton, fleece timber and groceries, whenever used reasonably can be recharged. The earths normal assets are there for us to utilize. We need water, food, air, vitality, meds, warmth, safe house and minerals. These keep us took care of, agreeable, solid and alive. On the off chance that we utilize the assets cautiously, at that point they will last inconclusively. In any case, on the off chance that we use them inefficiently and exorbitantly, they will before long run out and everybody will endure. Deforestation in the tropics is on the ascent. People presently chop or torch in excess of 100 sections of land a moment. Some timberland is cleared to clear a path for farmland; the rest is sliced for timber and to take care of the requests of the paper business. The rainforests are significant in light of the fact that they produce oxygen, they manage the universes atmosphere, safeguard various species and they yield a wide range of items. The rainforests are likewise cleared for cultivating, land, streets, railroads, fuel creation, (for example, charcoal) and mineral extraction, (for example, gold and iron metal). There are numerous outcomes associated with decimation of the rainforests. The principle one being a worldwide temperature alteration. This is caused on the grounds that less carbon dioxide is being expended and the less oxygen being delivered, more carbon dioxide will stay in the climate along these lines contributing progressively ozone harming substance, which thusly will see an ascent in the temperature of our planet. When we have utilized the entirety of the vitality from non-renewable energy source extraction (oil, coal and gas) that the earth has, there will be no more for many years. Non-renewable energy sources are not replenishable, hence we ought to be increasingly reasonable by they way we utilize this asset. ... <!

An Agile Guide to Integrating Customer Feedback

An Agile Guide to Integrating Customer Feedback This guide to customer feedback is part of our Agile project management series. To access more lessons, strategies and expert advice, download our free white paper, Staying Agile: 5 Best Practices in Software Project Management. Developing a product thats valued by your customer is pretty much the bread and butter of Agile project management. To achieve this, you  need to be sharing project progression and prototypes with your stakeholders (and end-users, if separate) at every iteration of your project.   The Importance of Customer Feedback in Agile Projects   Whether you’re producing a ground-breaking app for digital natives or a new CRM for your client’s operations team, preferences over accessibility and functionality will vary hugely. As a result, it’s essential that throughout your project, preferably after every Sprint, you share new features with your customers to determine whether: Features are actively providing value and not simply convoluting the product Features are accessible in terms of design and functionality for your stakeholders and importantly, your end-users. By inviting this customer feedback before the final product is launched, your team can save time and money on pushing unnecessary features forward. What’s more, you’ll end up with a more valuable and refined product, accurately tailored to your target audience. Did you know that a whopping 98% of respondents to the VersionOne 2016 State of Agile Report shared that their organization had realized success from taking an Agile approach to projects? As the first Agile principle, customer satisfaction and feedback are central to that success. 3 Strategies for Integrating Customer Feedback   Accessing and integrating user feedback without overburdening your project with an endless list of features can be a challenge. Fortunately, there are a number of strategies you can take to gather feedback effectively while preventing your project from over-extending. Staying Agile5 Best Practices in Software Project Management Download Free White Paper 1. Access Regular Customer Feedback Before you’re able to integrate user feedback, you first need to access it.  To do this, project management strategists  suggest taking a three-step approach to accessing feedback from stakeholders: Access: First, teams must find and identify a set of target customers that can be relied upon to provide accurate and timely insight, for example in the form of a well-maintained customer panel or advisory board.   Listen: Once a customer panel or advisory board has been secured, teams must build skills to actively listen to them. This should go beyond a single focus group or survey and should feature regular interaction, throughout the project, either in person or via online collaboration tools. Customers should be probed on their real needs, pain points, desires, and objective feedback on early designs and prototypes. This will also help to cut back on unnecessary features. Communicate: Ensure that what is learned through this listening process is clearly converted into prioritized use cases that explain the value of each feature, by communicating user insights to the entire project team. 2. Integrate Customer Feedback with Sprints The customer feedback collected should then be integrated at every project Sprint, alongside stakeholder feedback (if separate to the end-user group.)   One way to achieve this is by taking a Scrum approach to Agile project management.  If youre new to Scrum, the approach involves a Product Owner who communicates evolving business goals and customer feedback to the development teams.   In Scrum, the Product Owner retains a bird’s-eye view of the project and meets with the development team and ‘Scrum Master’ on a daily basis, to share customer feedback and insight.  Customer feedback, alongside stakeholder goals and needs, will then form each project Sprint. Following each Sprint, Scrum teams hold a Sprint Review, to present on what’s been completed to stakeholders. This process pushes team accountability and ensures that each Sprint’s completed tasks align with the project’s customer goals. 3. Allow Stakeholders to Manage Feature Prioritization While integrating customer feedback, it’s vital that the product doesnt go overboard with every feature requested by your customers. A key way to do so is by utilizing a workflow that puts your stakeholders in the driving seat for feature prioritization. This can either be done via a physical scrum wallboard or via an online collaboration tool. Staying Agile5 Best Practices in Software Project Management Download Free White Paper Creating a Physical Scrum Wallboard In order to manage feature prioritization collaboratively with their stakeholders, Jonathan Roger, Operations Director and Certified Scrum Master at software development company AndPlus, explains that they create a physical board for their Scrum task cards: “One way that we keep track of scope with our clients is by using different colored task cards on our project management wallboard to represent items that were added after a release plan was created,” Roger shares. “This makes it visually easy (for both us and the client) to identify items or features that were added after the initial project scope, so need to be traded with another feature of equivalent development hours in order to stay within budget, or postponed to a later release.” This allows AndPlus to put feature prioritization in the hands of their clients while keeping the project from growing beyond its scope and budget. Integrating via an Online Collaboration Tool Software development team Praxent  also takes a visual approach to scope management and have developed their own online collaboration tool to share with clients. CEO and Founder, Tim Hamilton, shares that the Praxent team developed a custom reporting and analytics dashboard, to place feature management in the hands of their clients: “Our dashboard provides a play-by-play on feature development progress, allowing clients to see the impact it would have on production should they decide to shift direction or re-prioritize” Hamilton shares. “Additionally, we provide them with data on how far their budget dollars will stretch, allowing them to control feature scope as they choose to add or swap in new features.” While not all Agile teams will have their own custom-made dashboard to play with, there are many online collaboration tools available, allowing teams to take a similar transparent approach to Kanban project management. Limit the number of tasks allowed within each Sprint Look for a tool that allows you to share your project roadmap with your client transparently, then limit the number of features created within each Sprint. By laying out all tasks in a project Sprint, including time estimates for how long you expect each task to take, and sharing this roadmap with your client, you can define a limit on the number of feature tasks per Sprint. This way, you can provide your client with the ability to manage feature prioritization, as they can swap features in and out of each Sprint. This will  enable transparency over how the changes will impact on the budget and schedule.   Staying Agile5 Best Practices in Software Project Management Download Free White Paper Although regularly embracing customer feedback can feel like a daunting prospect to some software teams, with these simple strategies, it doesn’t have to be.   For further strategies and advice on taking an Agile approach to project management, download our free white paper, Staying Agile: 5 Best Practices in Software Project Management. Do you have any experience in engaging customer feedback within Agile project management? We’d love to hear your thoughts and questions below! MeisterTaskAgile Task Management Made Simple ! !

Heat of Vaporization Example Problem

Heat of vaporization is the amount of heat energy required to change the state of a substance from a  liquid into  a vapor or gas. It is also known as enthalpy of vaporization, with units typically given in joules (J) or calories (cal). Heat of Vaporization Problem This sample problem demonstrates how to calculate the amount of energy required to turn a sample of water into steam: What is the heat in joules required to convert 25 grams of water into steam? What is the heat in calories?What you know: Heat of vaporization of water 2257 J/g 540 cal/g Note:  You wont be expected to know enthalpy or heat values; they will be given in a problem or can be looked up in a table. How to Solve You can solve this problem  using either joules or calories for heat. Part I: Use the formula  q m ·ÃŽâ€Hv in which q heat energy, m mass, and ΔHv heat of vaporization.q (25 g)x(2257 J/g)q 56425 JPart II: q m ·ÃŽâ€Hfq (25 g)x(540 cal/g)q 13500 cal Answer The amount of heat required to change 25 grams of water into steam is 56425 joules or 13500 calories. A related example illustrates how to calculate the energy when water changes from solid ice into steam.

Bill of Attainder Definition

A bill of attainder – sometimes called an act or writ of attainder or an ex-post facto law – is an act of a government’s legislature that declares a person or group of persons guilty of a crime and prescribing their punishment without the benefit of a trial or judicial hearing. The practical effect of a bill of attainder is to deny accused person’s civil rights and liberties. Article I, Section 9, paragraph 3, of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the enactment of bills of attainder, stating, â€Å"No Bill of Attainder or ex-post facto Law will be passed.† Key Takeaways: Bills of Attainder Bills of attainder, or ex-post-facto laws, are acts of Congress that declare a person or persons guilty of a crime without a trial or judicial hearing.As a part of English Common Law, monarchs often used bills of attainder to deny a person’s right to own property, the right to a title of nobility, or even right to life.Arbitrary British enforcement of bills of attainder on American colonists was a motivation for the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution.As direct denials of civil rights and liberties, bills of attainder are prohibited by Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution.The individual U.S. states are similarly prohibited from passing bills of attainder on their citizens by Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution.   Origin of Bills of Attainder Bills of attainder were originally part of English Common Law and were typically used by the monarchy to deny a person’s right to own property, the right to a title of nobility, or even right to life. Records from the English Parliament show that on January 29, 1542, Henry VIII secured bills of attainder that resulted in the executions of a number people holding titles of nobility. While the English Common Law right of habeas corpus guaranteed fair trials by a jury, a bill of attainder completely bypassed the judicial procedure. Despite their obviously unfair nature, bills of attainder were not banned throughout the United Kingdom until 1870. US Constitutional Ban of Bills of Attainder As a feature of English law at the time, bills of attainder were often enforced against residents of the thirteen American colonies. Indeed, outrage over the enforcement of bills attainder in the colonies was one of the motivations for the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution. The dissatisfaction of Americans with British attainder laws resulted in their being prohibited in the U.S. Constitution ratified in 1789. As James Madison wrote on January 25, 1788, in the Federalist Papers Number 44, â€Å"Bills of attainder, ex-post facto laws, and laws impairing the obligations of contracts, are contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation. ... The sober people of America are weary of the fluctuating policy which has directed the public councils. They have seen with regret and indignation that sudden changes and legislative interferences, in cases affecting personal rights, become jobs in the hands of enterprising and influential speculators, and snares to the more-industrious and less-informed part of the community.† The Constitution’s ban of the use of bills of attainder by the federal government contained in Article I, Section 9 was considered so important by the Founding Fathers, that a provision banning state law bills of attainder was included in the first clause of ​Article I, Section 10. The Constitution’s bans of bills of attainder at both the federal and state level serve two purposes: They enforce the fundamental doctrine of separation of powers by forbidding the legislative branch from performing functions constitutionally delegated to the judicial or executive branch.  They embody the protections of due process of law expressed in the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments. Along with the U.S. Constitution, the constitutions of ever state expressly forbid bills of attainder. For example, Article I, Section 12 of the constitution of the State of Wisconsin reads, â€Å"No bill of attainder, ex-post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.† Sources and Further Reference Saunders, Thomas M. â€Å"Defining Bills of Attainder.† The Bill of Attainder Project. Lipson, Barry J. â€Å"Bill of Attainder: Trial by Legislature.† Federally Speaking (Number 36).

Calyx Corolla Case Analysis Free Essays

1. The strength of the Calyx Corolla formula is that they enhance the delivering speed so that customers get fresher flowers. Also, it lowers the cost of delivery from growers to C C, from wholesellers to retailers, and from retailers to customers. We will write a custom essay sample on Calyx Corolla Case Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now But there are also problems in the formula. For example, it is hard to control the quality of the products. C C has to monitor the growers and Fed, and spend extra money to maintain the high quality of the products. . Calyx Corolla has been successful because they make delivery more efficient, which is to deliver flowers directly from growers to customers so that the plants are fresher. Also, they accurately position themselves and send catalogues to people who are likely to buy flowers. It’s an efficient way to market without a large amount of cost. Third, they developed business partners to promote selling. 3. The large growers like Sunbay Company also distribute and sell flowers themselves. They also buy flowers from other growers. Thus it is hard to control the quality of the flowers they provide. The large growers like Sunbay Company are both partners and competitors because they also sell flowers to customers. 4. They are growing the business by launching an advertising campaign. They will advertise on television emphasizing the longevity and freshness of the lowers. They will insert mini-catalogs into newspaper supplements and magazines. 5. The company is customer-oriented. They directly link consumers with growers in order to reduce the time it took to deliver, thus ensure the freshness and longevity of the consumers. They will not let flowers frozen outside the door in the cold days if they fail to deliver it, because it this will not encourage consumers to buy flowers from them again. They send catalogs regularly and change their banquets seasonally to meet consumers’ needs. All they have done is to keep the â€Å"life-time† customers. They are not only selling flowers, they are selling good service as well. 6. It’s easy for customers to find what they want through the website, because the company has provided different ways of categorizing the bouquets. Customers can decide what kind of flowers they need according to different situations. It’s very customer-oriented. How to cite Calyx Corolla Case Analysis, Essay examples

S. Namuuntulga Tuesday 14.20 Essays - Perception, Nervous System

S. Namuuntulga Tuesday 14.20 The nose sense of smell and taste The nose is a organ used for breathing and smelling that is found in the center of the face above the mouth. At the end of the nose there is a pair of nostrils, these allow you to breathe in air and exhale it. At the end of the nostrils comes the nasal cavity. Going farther up, the cavities divide into 3 shelf-like bones called nasal concha e or turbinates these warm inhaled air. The outside of the nose consists of a elastic tissue called cartilage. The human nose is in fact the main organ of smell as well as taste. We can recognise thousands of different smells, and we are able to detect odours even in infinitesimal quantities. The sense of smell is very closely related to the sense of taste. Sometimes the odor makes us think what the food will taste like, if we did not have the sense of smell the sense of taste would be greatly affected, you would have the basic tastes but nothing like you have now. Smell occurs in the olfactory, this is where nerve receptors lie, then passes through to the mouth causing most of the sensation of taste. Smell-sensitivity researchers have to be very careful about the odours they use in experiments, because a smell is not always a smell. Many odorous substances activate not only the olfactory system but also the somatosensory' system -the nerve endings in our noses which are sensitive to temperature, pain etc. This is why anosmics ' - patients who have completely lost their sense of smell - can still detect menthol, phenylethyl alcoh ol and many other substances. The sense of smell triggers a fight or flight response that helps survival. Our ability to taste is another scientific feat on its own. We are able to tell great tasting food from unpalatable ones of the millions of taste cells called "gustatory cells" that are clustered within taste buds of the tongue, lining of your throat and roof of the mouth. That we're born with around 10,000 taste buds. When we chew food or drink soup, these substances combine with our saliva and release molecules that stimulate these gustatory cells. Like the nose, there are specific taste cells responsible for detecting and identifying a taste quality. Your gustatory cells send signals to your brain to interpret the taste or group of tastes that are being detected. There are five basic taste qualities: sweet, sour, salty, bitter and savory or "umami". Umami is brought by glutamate, which can be found naturally in protein-rich foods or artificially in form our monosodium glutamate, also known as " vetsin ". Taste, along with smell determines flavors of food or other sub stances. In conclusion, nose is in fact the main organ of smell as well as taste. Both senses - smell and taste are part of our body's chemosensory system, or simply referred to as the "chemical senses". This is because taste and smell both work by making sense of the chemicals surrounding us - the substances that combine to create a dish or the millions of molecules that comprise different odors. References http://www.encyclopedia.com